🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to ban social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are watching closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a increasing number of nations are moving toward parallel measures.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that smartphones and apps are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". The policy could be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Officials have stated that an similar ban is "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has asked the legislature to pass a bill lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged families to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless parental consent is provided. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these services, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a solid starting point," commented the MEP supporting the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Last year, interest built behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. However, the government pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed apprehensions. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after being exposed to dangerous social media material argues that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for minors," said a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, regulation is mostly unfolding at the regional government level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has passed a law banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a law capping minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced laws demanding parental consent for minors to open social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from certain figures to copy this path, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Beyond the West, other states are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, world agencies strike a more cautious stance. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The organization points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

While this international conversation evolves, the steps of this nation and others show that policymakers globally are increasingly content to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.